vidspawn vidspawn
Become a supporterGitHubDownload for macOS
A fair comparison

vidspawn vs Loom

Same job, opposite architecture: Loom keeps your recordings in its cloud, vidspawn keeps them on your disk. Every Loom claim below is sourced from loom.com or a linked public review.

vidspawn vs Loom
vidspawnvidspawnLoom
Custody
Where recordings liveYour disk, plus your own cloud when you shareLoom's cloud
Account requiredNone to record; your own cloud account to shareLoom account
Open sourceAGPL-3.0, full sourceNo
Capabilities
A dropped connection mid-takeHarmless: nothing uploads during captureCloud-dependent upload and processing
TranscriptionOn-device with whisper, included freeCloud-side; AI features sit on the $24 tier
Agent surface35 MCP tools over local HTTP, 6 headless over stdioNone advertised
Pricing
Free tierThe complete individual product: no caps, no watermarks25 videos · 5-minute cap · 720p
Team pricingTeams $12/seat/mo annual, in your company's own cloud (waitlist)Business $18/user/mo · Business + AI $24/user/mo

Loom facts fetched from loom.com/pricing on 2026-08-07. If anything here goes stale, open an issue on GitHub and we will fix it.

vidspawn holds the edge Loom holds the edge
From public reviews of other recorders

"The app performance is very poor that i 've to restart my recording alot."

Loom user · Capterra ↗

"free version you hit limits fast, and can't really store much before needing to upgrade"

Loom user · Capterra ↗

"Currently, I am unable to view or access my past library when logging into my account."

Loom user · Atlassian Community ↗

Public reviews by users of other products, quoted verbatim and linked. They describe those products, not vidspawn.

When Loom is the better fit
You need Windows, web or mobile capture today: vidspawn is macOS-only.You want a managed team library right now: vidspawn Teams is a waitlist, not a product yet.You lean on deep Slack, Jira and Salesforce integrations.You want viewer analytics on shared videos.

Same job. Opposite architecture. Your recordings, or theirs.